I am copying an email that I received from a marketplace for sellers who sell on the internet. It is informative on this subject. I have left out any mention of the site’s name since I am posting this on Bonanza.
Their email is more professionally well-written compared to a previous thread that was started up on this last week and so I wanted to share.
I should mention here that just because the Supreme Court ruled in favor of online internet sales tax, it does not mean it has gone through Congress yet. Calling and emailing your Congressman on this subject is a good thing to do at this point. It is almost most definite that this will go through since it is the Supreme Court that did the ruling, at least in some form.
Let Congress know that this would be an unfair burden on small businesses.
(This is separate from what is already in place, which is that sales tax we collect for our own state is supposed to be turned into our state).
“Last week the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in the Internet sales tax case of South Dakota v. Wayfair, removing the requirement that any retailer, even a larger one, have a physical presence in a state in order for that state to impose sales and use tax obligations on that retailer. The Court’s decision states that the South Dakota law “applies only to sellers who engage in a significant quantity of business in the State, and respondents are large, national companies that undoubtedly maintain an extensive virtual presence.”
Our position is very clear – we firmly believe that if this ruling is applied to smaller retailers, it will harm the small businesses, entrepreneurs and artisans who use the Internet to make a living. Small businesses should be protected from new taxes, out-of-state audits and onerous collection burdens because they can least afford the added costs. xxxx also wants to protect buyers who choose to shop with smaller sellers online and would face increased prices due to the costs associated with having to comply with new and highly burdensome tax rules.
If you sell on xxxx, you may be wondering how this ruling affects you. At this point, there is nothing specific that you need to do. As always, if you have tax questions we recommend that you consult with your accountant or tax advisor.
We expect more developments and information on this subject in the coming months. In the meantime, we will aggressively press Congress to step in and provide clear tax rules with a robust small business exemption."
Here is an article by Fox News on the Supreme Court’s [URL removed]
[URL removed]
And another article by [URL removed]
[URL removed]
![]() |
EmpressDepot Reputation: 7344 See EmpressDepot's booth |
Thanks EmpressDepot, That makes things a little clearer.
![]() |
Tammies_Treasures Reputation: 574 See Tammies_Treasures' booth |
“…removing the requirement that any retailer, even a larger one, have a physical presence in a state in order for that state to impose sales and use tax obligations on that retailer.”
That means that states COULD impose a sales tax requirement if they choose to do so. Of course, most PROBABLY will since it is $$$ that they haven’t had before. Each state would have to enact its own law in order to require payment of sales tax. The way government is so screwed up these days, it could be YEARS before wide-scale requirements and enforcement is in place. There may even be a phase-in period.
Having collection of local (city/county) taxes on top of the state sales tax complicates everything. There is going to have to be a simplification in order not to impact small-time sellers. At the very least, I would expect that local sales taxes might be left out of collections and that sellers would only have to deal with 50 state tax rates (minus the states that don’t charge any sales tax currently).
IMO, I fully expect waivers for little sellers UNLESS states make it simple. That could mean that sellers would charge a buyer sales tax based on the state the seller lives in. At least then you are only dealing with ONE tax percentage and you pay your own state. Of course, if every state did that, sellers who live in states with lower (or no) sales taxes would have an advantage over sellers located in higher-taxed states. So, that could be a problem. Hopefully, no matter what happens, there will be some kind of waivers in place. I’m not looking forward to writing a check (or doing an electronic deposit) for $0.36 to Hawaii.
![]() |
tomwayne1 Reputation: 8637 See tomwayne1's booth |
Would love to know if Bonanza will be gathering the taxes or doing this for us before I add a mass amount of vintage items here.
Thanks for any response.
![]() |
GracefulAnVintage Reputation: 152 See GracefulAnVintage's booth |
Hello Dear
Did you received my request?
Waiting to hear from you soon
e-mail. cedetsimoneaskeweas101@gmail.com
![]() |
okanga101 Reputation: 708 |
Viewed: 1372 time
Asked: Translation missing: es.datetime.distance_in_words.almost_x_years ago
Latest response: Translation missing: es.datetime.distance_in_words.almost_x_years ago
Remember these tips:
- Use links to other sources to support your opinions
- Use examples where possible
- Put yourself in the inquirers shoes: what extra info would be helpful?
Should I post a comment or an answer?
You can only post one answer, so make it count. Maybe your reply is more fitting as a comment instead?
Post an answer for:
- Replies that directly and specifically answer the original question
Post a comment for:
- "Thanks," "Me too," "I agree," or "Works for me" types of replies
- When you would like the original poster to provide more details
- When you have more to add to someone else's question or answer
See also our Roundtable FAQ.
Formatting
Community help posts follow certain formatting guidelines, which may impact the look of your post. If you're interested in tweaking the format, instructions are available here.
4 Comment